Eppendorf 5702 vs Drucker Diagnostics DASH: A Practical Replacement Guide for Canadian Labs

Replacing a clinical centrifuge is not just a spec comparison. In Canadian labs, the real decision comes down to throughput, tube compatibility, workflow consistency, bench space, and how quickly you can get parts or support when something goes sideways.

The Eppendorf 5702 family has been a popular choice for low to mid speed centrifugation in clinical, research, and cell culture labs. If you are replacing or upgrading a 5702, Drucker Diagnostics’ DASH line (DASH 12 and DASH 24) is a strong North American alternative designed around clinical blood tube workflows.

At Cambridge Environmental Products, we help Canadian labs select the right model the first time to minimize downtime and avoid validation headaches.

Quick Spec Comparison Table: Eppendorf 5702 vs DASH 12 vs DASH 24

               

Note: The Eppendorf 5702’s capacity and RCF depend on the rotor installed. The DASH models are ready to run clinical configurations.

Comparison Badges: Which One Fits Your Lab?

Best for STAT labs and tight benches: DASH 12
Best for high throughput clinics: DASH 24
Best for mixed applications and rotor flexibility: Eppendorf 5702

Clinical Centrifuge Comparison: The Differences That Matter

1) Rotor strategy: flexibility vs simplicity

The Eppendorf 5702 platform is versatile because it uses interchangeable rotors. That flexibility can be valuable in mixed-use environments, but it also adds complexity.

• Multiple rotors can mean more purchasing, more storage, and more changeover steps.

• Rotor swaps increase the chance of variation between operators and shifts.

The Drucker DASH line is designed to reduce that overhead.

• DASH units come configured for clinical workflows.

• You do not manage a “rotor ecosystem” to run routine blood tube spins.

If your 5702 is used mostly for blood collection tubes, moving to a DASH unit often simplifies daily operations immediately.

2) Interface and programming: consistency across staff

In clinical environments, repeatability matters. Manual knob control works, but it is more operator dependent.

• The Eppendorf 5702 uses rotary knobs for manual control.

• DASH models provide a digital interface with 10 programmable memory positions plus preset cycles.

For Canadian labs running multiple shifts, programmability helps standardize runs and reduce setup time.

3) Throughput: choose capacity instead of managing rotors

Eppendorf capacity depends on the rotor installed, and the same lab may run different configurations depending on who is using the centrifuge.

The DASH line makes the decision clearer:

• DASH 12 is built for moderate throughput.

• DASH 24 is built for higher throughput.

This is often a more practical choice for clinics and reference labs because throughput is predictable and rotor swaps disappear.

4) Speed and RCF: match your SOPs, not marketing numbers

The Eppendorf 5702 reaches 4,400 RPM, with RCF varying by rotor. The DASH line provides comparable or higher clinical performance depending on model.

• DASH 12: up to 5,200 RPM and 4,000 xg

• DASH 24: up to 4,500 RPM and 3,450 xg

Both models are suitable for many standard clinical protocols, but your SOPs should drive the final decision, especially if you have tight time requirements or specific g-force targets.

PRP and Blood Tube Processing: Choosing the Right DASH Model

Choose DASH 12 if you:

• Process 6 to 12 tubes per run

• Want higher speed capability up to 5,200 RPM and 4,000 xg

• Need a compact footprint for smaller benches

• Run STAT-style workflows where quick turnaround matters

• Currently use your 5702 with smaller rotor configurations

Choose DASH 24 if you:

• Process 12 to 24 tubes per run

• Need maximum tube capacity for busy daily volume

• Want compatibility across common 13 mm and 16 mm tube formats

• Prefer ready to run clinic throughput without rotor changes

• Currently use your 5702 with higher capacity rotor setups
  
  

  Canadian Use Cases: What We Commonly See

  Selection patterns in Canada are typically driven by volume and workflow.

  • DASH 12 is often the best fit for smaller clinics, satellite labs, and settings where bench space is limited and runs are frequent but smaller.

  • DASH 24 is a strong fit for high-volume clinics and outpatient labs where batching and throughput reduce turnaround pressure.

  • Eppendorf 5702 is still common in research-adjacent environments where flexibility for mixed tube formats matters more than operator standardization.

  If you are unsure, the fastest way to decide is to look at your busiest day and count how many tubes you run per hour, not per shift.
  
  

  Lab Equipment Canada: Maintenance, Service, and Longevity Considerations

  In Canada, centrifuge replacement decisions often come down to service reality.

  Before choosing any model, confirm:

  • Support pathway: who supports the centrifuge for Canadian customers, and how service is initiated.

  • Parts lead time into Canada: where parts ship from and typical timelines.

  • Downtime planning: whether you need a backup unit, a second centrifuge, or a staged replacement.

  • Warranty clarity: what is covered, what is excluded, and how calibration is handled.

  If you are in a region where service coverage is limited, prioritizing a predictable service pathway can matter more than small spec differences.
  
  

  Centrifuge Replacement Checklist for Canadian Labs

  Use this checklist before you buy:

  • 🧪 Tube format: 13 mm vs 16 mm, tube length, and your actual tube brands

  • 📈 Daily volume: average and peak day tube counts

  • ⏱️ Protocol targets: required RCF and run time, plus brake behavior if relevant

  • 📏 Bench space: footprint, lid clearance, and placement near power

  • 🛠️ Service plan: warranty terms and parts lead time into Canada
    
    

    Making the Transition from Eppendorf to Drucker: How Cambridge Helps

    Switching from an Eppendorf 5702 to a DASH centrifuge is usually straightforward when you confirm three things up front: tube compatibility, throughput, and SOP alignment.

    We can help you:

    • Verify the right model based on your current rotor usage and sample volume

    • Confirm speed and RCF alignment with your lab protocols

    • Ensure compatibility for your tube formats and routine workflows

    • Plan changeover to minimize downtime
      
      

      Get a Quote in Canada

      If you want a clean recommendation and a Canadian-supplied quote, send us:

      • Tube type and size (13 mm or 16 mm, and tube length)

      • Typical samples per run and peak daily volume

      • Any must-have SOP requirements (RCF, time, braking)

      We will confirm fit and recommend the best option. 

      Optional: If you want to speed this up, request our one-page Centrifuge Selection Checklist and email it back completed. We will respond with a model recommendation and quote.

Take a Drucker for Spin!